Archive for the ‘Life’ Category

Another day, another deathbot

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

Iran has unveiled it’s first in-house deathbot, but before everyone lines up to pat the defense department on the back for their sterling efforts, lets spare a thought for the marketing department who managed to come up with this description of said deathbot:

This jet is a messenger of honour and human generosity and a saviour of mankind, before being a messenger of death for enemies of mankind

You just know that the person who came up with that was wearing a suit paired with really, really shiny shoes.

With great power there must also come great responsibility

Friday, August 13th, 2010

In the same week that the story of Jessi Slaughter came to light, this post appeared on Engadget.

Free speech is a right that everyone should be entitled to, but when you say something, it’s all on you if it offends/upsets people. If you say something that a lot of people find offensive/upsetting then you can expect a lot of people to tell you about it and you have to except that they might do that in a way that you find offensive and upsetting.

So you are responsible for what you say, but what if someone provides you with a stage? With maybe the exception of reporting on something upsetting/offensive as a news item, the stage provider is effectively endorsing the content of your message. It is a reflection on them. Websites such as YouTube have a right to uphold their standards by refusing to post, or by removing videos containing content that they find objectionable. This is not censorship. You have the right to free speech, not to have people agree with you. The important point here is that the judgment call on what is acceptable lies with the stage provider, even if they use popular opinion to make their decision on where the threshold of acceptability lies.

In the case of Jessi Slaughter who is a minor (yes, I know that’s not her real name), her parents take on the responsibility for not protecting her from the full horror of the internet and the responsibility for not policing what she was saying*, she did instigate the entire episode after all.

In exactly the same way, Apple and Google have the right to refuse to allow apps containing content that they find objectionable in their respective app stores (the rejection of apps for the purpose of gaining/maintaining market control is an issue for another post). You want Nazi wallpaper on your smart phone, go do it, but don’t expect Apple/Google to help you.

I wrote this post because freedom of the internet is one of those subjects that people like to convince themselves is full of grey areas, when really it isn’t. The internet is as self policing as the spoken word, it’s just that people don’t like having to make the decision on what is black and what is white because they are making clear where their own threshold of acceptability is and other people might disagree.

*Despite what one of the talking heads on GMA said, rap music is not responsible for Jessi Slaughter’s actions.

House Syndrome (Quick to the point, to the point no faking).

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

The theme of this short but sweet post is fakery, inspired by a week filled with it (and full of it).

Maybe I’m in the minority, but I think the Apple press conference on Antenna Gate was perfect. It was such an Apple thing to do. Steve Jobs rolled up on the stage and called out all of the media for their part in spinning the story into an international headline. The videos of the other smart phones being death gripped were cool, I don’t care how many companies release rebuttal statements – if the videos were in any way unfair or inaccurate they would be suing, and they aren’t.  To silence the remaining dissenters (fanboys), Steveo offered free cases or free returns; an immediate smack down to the haters drawing parallels between Vista and iPhone 4.

My point is that I just don’t have time for the perennial Salesman type: from the guy packaged in the clothes he thinks you think he should be wearing, to the sensationlist news reporter or politician looking to spin a situation in a favourable light. I guess that’s why I like Twitter, because I have been able to build up a stable of people who are real, who are opinionated in a good way and who are able to hold sometimes polar opposite opinions and yet co-exist with each other. I am unapologetically honest because life is easier that way. I speak my mind and sometimes it gets me into trouble, but hey, that’s me – take it or leave it.

When Gregory House met Vanilla Ice.

[Note: Dear future me. Please don't forget any of the things that inspired this post.]

Dot Robot: Literary awesomeness

Monday, June 28th, 2010

I have just finished reading Dot Robot, the first book in the techno thriller trilogy by Jason Bradbury*. I rarely read fiction, I’m more of a biography or software textbook kind of guy. The last piece of fiction I consumed was a few years ago, it was the first novel penned by Mick Foley, wrestling superstar and New York Times best-selling autobiographer, so the bar was set quite high for the man from The Gadget Show. Have no fear though because Dot Robot is the very definition of a page turner, it’s awesome. I’m a self confessed geek, so the premise of the story of Dot Robot was like every dream I’ve ever had (except for the ones with Megan Fox in them ;-), a tale of good vs evil, played out in a world of gadgets, computers and the internet. I think Dot Robot is supposed to be for kids, but so is The Simpsons and for me, like The Simpsons, Dot Robot manages to pull off the difficult task of simultaneously appealing to young and er… not so young (hey – I’m far from old).

The experience of reading this book really was like riding a roller coaster, a gripping, multi-emotional, twisting and turning journey, that at one point actually had me so mad that I was completely unable to put the book down. The bottom line is that if you are a geek, of any age and/or sex, you need to read this book, but just be sure that you have the next in the series available for when you finish it, I didn’t and the suspense of the cliff hanger finish of book one is killing me!

* Jase is such a top bloke that he actually sent me a signed copy of his book!

But what about the Cheerleader!?!

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

It’s been a bad week for fans of serial television shows; Flash Forward, Heroes and Law & Order have all been canceled. I’m sure that the people that made the decisions to cancel these shows thought that they were doing the right thing, but I just can’t see it. Let me qualify that, even if from a business perspective, the falling advertising revenues were making the shows less profitable, or even not profitable at all, they shouldn’t have been canceled like that *clicks fingers*.

The people watching these shows invest hours of their lives in them and they simply are not going to do that if the shows keep getting canceled without the stories being properly resolved. I specifically have not watched Flash Forward because I couldn’t see it surviving past one or two seasons and can say the same for Stargate Universe. The Stargate franchise is a brilliant example of the two ways in which things can go wrong, on the one hand you’ve got SG-1, where towards the end the story arcs were crippled by the seemingly constant threat of cancellation, everything felt like it was under developed so that it could be wrapped up in a couple of episodes. On the other extreme you have Atlantis, which showed no signs of death until suddenly an attempt was made to wrap everything up in a couple of episodes. In both cases, the stories and characters that viewers had invested so much time in were gone without an acceptable resolution. Television executives please note, straight to DVD movies are not an acceptable appeasement for this, even if they help to ease the pain.

I guess we’ll just have to add Heroes to the ever increasing list of awesome shows that died too soon.

Political Apathy 7: The fall of the Empire (look, an Ewok)

Sunday, April 25th, 2010

So I’ve made my decision on who to vote for and just thought you might be interested to know who I’ve picked and why.

Right off the bat I’m going to say that the leaders debates have proven to be most thought provoking for me (I am really looking forward to Mr Dimbleby and the Beeb showing ITV and Sky how it should be done though). I’ll be honest and say that I was concerned about these debates originally, specifically because:

  1. Not all of the leaders of the UK political parties were getting to take part: This concern was fully justified, lots of talk about immigration from outside of the EU, but no debate about immigration within the EU. I don’t think they could have gotten away with this if UKIP were involved. Also, the Lib Dems position on Trident would have been challenged. “We won’t replace Trident!”, sounds good and it’s what the Lib Dems were shouting, but “We won’t replace Trident directly, but might get something else similar.” doesn’t sound as good. My biggest beef in this area was the fact that the Digital Economy Bill didn’t get mentioned once!
  2. I was worried that there wouldn’t be any real debate, just lots of reading of prepared statements: I was delighted to see that this was not the case.
  3. I was worried that 2 would mean that Darth Cameron would be thriving whilst Gordon Brown and Nick Clegg drowned: Erm yeah, I needn’t gave worried. First round: Nick wins, GB was on the ropes, Darth Cameron was on the canvas. Second round: Nick wins on points, despite Dave getting one of Murdoch’s Minions to tag team with him (GB did much better too).

The debates were not the only source from which I drew my information. I have had an array of pamphlets, leaflets (what is the difference between a pamphlet and a leaflet?) and other “stuff” deposited through my letterbox recently and I have read all of it. The Greens and the Tories did quite a good job here, Labour did a terrible job and here’s why:

  1. As I have previously noted here I was annoyed by the leaflets that presented the 2005 election results as evidence for the Greens being unable to take the Brighton Pavilion seat. I’m not stupid, do not treat me like I am.
  2. They addressed everything to me *and* my brother!?! We are two separate people who are so far apart in our beliefs that you wouldn’t believe we were raised by the same parents, or on the same planet even. He does not care about politics, in fact it scares me that people as ignorant as him get a vote at all, please treat us as individuals. I’m not saying send two letters, but maybe just address it to me.

Still, at least Labour tried. When I receive the Lib Dem end of term report card I will be entering “Could try harder.” in the general comments box; not a single piece of Lib Dem propaganda was received.

Political Detritous

I was quite convinced I was going to vote Green until the Green manifesto came out. If the Conservative spending cuts will risk the recovery from recession, then the Greens policies will certainly kill it. Just picking on one point, how can doubling the price of petrol be even a remotely sensible idea? I applaud the desire to protect the environment but you have to have the infrastructure to support mass migration to public transport before you stop the average family from being able to afford a car. What happens when nobody is buying petrol? How will the public transport be funded then? With huge taxes?

I was seriously wavering. I don’t dislike any of the PPCs in Brighton Pavilion, they all seem like nice people (I follow them all on Twitter) and then I sat down and really thought about it.

I cannot vote for Labour. Labour have had 13 years in power and have achieved some great things (like the minimum wage), but they have also made some major mistakes, worse still, they plan on making some more:

  1. University fees.
  2. ID cards.
  3. Digital economy bill.
  4. Unprecedented levels of debt (no more boom and bust eh Gordon?).
  5. Misleading everyone about the evidence to support going to war in Iraq.
  6. My current Labour MP has been an epic fail. I wrote to him about the DE Bill, I only ever got a response saying “I got your letter” and he didn’t bother with the main debate (maybe if it had effected Cyprus).

I cannot vote for the Conservatives, Darth Cameron might be a Sith, but I assure you that his light sabre is blue. Anyone who thinks that in a period where “tough decisions need to be made” to reduce levels of debt that an inheritance tax break for properties worth £2000000.00 is important is either high on crack or a Conservative. The only proof I needed of Dave’s intentions was to watch a guy from Varndean School ask him about fox hunting, the question was not about whether the law was well written, or whether people were flouting it, or whether the police were failing to enforce it properly, or if it was taking up to much of their time, but these were the answers he gave. We don’t need time in parliament for a free vote on this issue, we’ve done it already. If the law needs to be improved to make things easier for the police then discuss those changes, but of course he doesn’t want to do that because he is completely in favour of hunting foxes, badgers, otters and probably people on welfare too (OK, I made that last one up).

I cannot vote for the Liberal Democrats. I am not amongst the number of people noticing the Lib Dems for the first time during the debates. It’s like the Ewoks emerging from the forest, they might be Ewoks, and Ewoks are immensely cool, but they do not have a chance of winning the seat of Brighton Pavilion and my vote would be wasted if lavished upon them, allowing Labour and the Conservatives a better chance of winning it.

I cannot vote for Labour, the Conservatives or the Lib Dems because they were all engaged in the expenses scandal and none of you are sorry for what you did, just sorry you got caught.

Back to the Greens. Caroline Lucas will never (or at least not in the coming parliament) be in a position to put the more extreme aspects of the Green manifesto in to place, but she won’t ever be whipped and will be able to promote fairness (proportional representation ftw), consideration of the environment, animal rights and civil liberties in a sort of Jiminy Cricket like role and so she gets my vote, but she didn’t win it, everyone else lost it.

Political Apathy 6: Epic Fail

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Every time one of the ‘major’ parties does/says/announces something it usually just helps to remind me how out of touch they are. I received a letter from Nancy Platts today (Nancy is the Labour PPC for Brighton Pavilion), the basic jist of which was that if I voted Green I risked letting in the Tories (this fact was in big bold letters at the bottom of the page).

  1. The voting figures from the last General Election are ancient. A lot of water has passed under the bridge since then, including a set of European elections that at worst suggest that the Greens have made significant gains.
  2. No I wouldn’t support Labour’s plan to change the voting system. Why switch one flawed system with another? Do it properly and give us proportional representation where every single vote counts, or don’t bother at all.
  3. Would I prefer a Labour or Conservative government? Well, that’s like asking me if I’d rather be poked in the eye, or kicked in the nuts… I’m not that crazy about either option.

Bottom line, this letter did nothing to dissuade me from voting Green, in fact, in strengthened my resolve even more. Epic. Fail.

Good news for goats

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

When I was younger, I would always look forward to my parents going out and Molly, the nice Irish lady from next door, coming around to babysit. I loved to hear her tell the story of The Billy Goats Gruff. If you have heard this story then you know that Trolls live under bridges in the middle of nowhere, but what I suspect you don’t know is that somebody has erected an exchange in the middle of nowhere and that all of the bridges have ADSL connections and that the Trolls are now spending their time on the internet. (Yes, this is good news if you are a goat).

At the beginning of the year I was reading some posts on Joystiq about the best PS3 games of 2009, I thoroughly enjoyed the posts because I felt they reflected the opinions of the authors and not of any sponsors that the website may have (which is why I stopped reading gaming magazines). In one of the posts it was suggested that Killzone 2 was a disappointment, Kevin Kelly didn’t say it was a terrible game, just not the game that most people were expecting, a sentiment that I agreed with completely but that sparked a huge debate riot in the comments section. A subsequent post on the same theme listed KZ2 in its “good” list and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 in it’s disappointment list. I disagreed with both of these choices, but could see that it was just someone with a slightly different taste in games expressing their opinion, however the comments list was once again the victim of marauding trolls flaming anyone that dared to dislike KZ2. I tweeted about how unreadable the comments sections were and was surprised to receive a response from one of the news writers at Joystiq, acknowledging that there were some “unfortunate remarks” but suggesting that I should “take the good with the bad”. I can see what he meant, after all I applaud the people calling for a new version of Time Splitters, accept many of the criticisms of MW2 and can see that some of the pro-KZ2 crowd were expressing genuine opinions, I just feel that the human : troll ratio was incorrectly balanced.

Then this post popped up on Engadget explaining how Windows 7′s market share had already “surpassed all OS X versions that are being tracked”, here the flame baiting started in the frickin’ article. (Kudos to the first commentor on this post though who succinctly captured my feelings when he added “Yeah, no sh!t, and the sky is blue. Is this really news?”).

Flame baiting/trolling is not big and it isn’t clever and tends to suggest that you have failed to develop the skills necessary to a) have a proper, rational debate and b) realise when someone holds a differing opinion and to respect it and move on and hence the rest of us are more likely to ignore you than engage you in a pointless debate.

I would like to finish this post by mentioning another Joystiq post on the game M.A.G. which caused me to start watching this series of videos on YouTube. I downloaded (eventually) the beta for this game and my experiences were exactly the same as the guy in the video so I genuinely lolled at it. I know a lot of people are going to rush out and buy this game and will love it in every way (and that’s fine), but give me MW2 or a miniature flaming ninja monkey with a chaingun any day!

Peace in our time

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

My Mum has violated JoJo’s rule #7… this could be very bad.

Rule #7 states that you should never buy me clothing without first applying, in writing, for a license to do so. The application should contain a formal declaration of the item of clothing to be purchased, preferably with photographic support. It is true that it is rare for a license to be granted, but this is no excuse for violating the rule, the last time this happened I ended up with a… oops, nearly put my foot in it.

It looks like a bullet has been dodged as although not as terrifying as the last item of contraband clothing, it wasn’t quite to my taste, but proved to be too small and the producers of it do not make a larger size (get in!).

Today there will be no bloodshed.

Nine Again

Friday, January 1st, 2010

At one time I was this kid… ow, who am I kidding, I’m still this kid and I am ridiculously excited about the imminent return of the Pink and Black Attack to Monday Night RAW. The best wrestling characters are said to be an amplification of ones own persona, guess that confirms that Bret Hart is the best there is, the best there was and the best there ever will be. I’m tempted to bust out my WWF bedding!